Horse industry ponies up for political campaigns

Written by JAMES R. CARROLL
Louisville Courier-Journal

WASHINGTON (May 13, 2012) — America’s horse industry has contributed more than $8.7 million to state and federal campaigns and political parties since 1989, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Sunlight Foundation.

Equine-related interests also have spent $2.2 million lobbying in Washington, the foundation said.

Political action committees connected to the Lexington, Ky.-based National Thoroughbred Racing Association and the American Horse Council, as well as horse breeders and owners, contributed to both parties, including the current president of the United States and his predecessor.

Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY). (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY). (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has collected more than $130,000 from the industry, making him the top recipient. Former President George W. Bush was second, with $129,000, and President Barack Obama is fourth at $72,000.

The analysis did not include contributions from the nation’s racetracks, including Churchill Downs, its other tracks and Lexington’s Keeneland, because Sunlight considered the tracks as parts of the gaming and casino industry. Read full report >>

:: Horse industry ponies up for political campaigns (report pdf)

RELATED READING

Ditch Mitch Kentucky, Tuesday’s Horse, Sept. 23, 2008

Senator threatened USDA over horse inspections, Tuesday’s Horse, Sept. 9, 2008

McConnell opposed USDA inspectors of sored horses, Tuesday’s Horse, Sept. 2, 2008

Sponsoring Horse Slaughter: Pfizer – The Company That Keeps on Giving

Special Report
by JANE ALLIN

A collection of acronyms to ponder:

American Quarter Horse Association (AQHA)
American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP)
American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA)
Unwanted Horse Coalition (UHC)
United Organizations of the Horse (UOH)
American Horse Council (AHC)
North American Equine Ranching Information Council (NAERIC)
Equine Health and Welfare Council (EHWC)
National Thoroughbred Racing Association (NTRA)
American Humane Association (AHA)
American Paint Horse Association (APHA)
Arabian Horse Association (ArHA)

Profiting From the Innocent – Zealots of Economic Rewards (PFIZER)

Q. The common theme?
A. Pro-horse slaughter.

Q. The connection?
A. Horse organizations sponsored by Pfizer.

It seems that Pfizer’s support for horse slaughter as a humane alternative is not simply limited to its vested interest in the PMU industry and the need to justify the wastage that occurs within it.

In June of this year there was probing speculation as to Pfizer’s agenda behind the unabashed sponsorship of the live chat on “Unwanted Horses” aired immediately on the heels of the release of the long awaited GAO slaughter report. What explicitly placed the company under the microscope was that the call-in was hosted by Tom Lentz, Senior Director, Equine Veterinary Services, at Pfizer Animal Health.

More importantly Lenz an acknowledged slaughter proponent is former Chair of the AHC’s “Unwanted Horse Coalition” (UHC), past President of the American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) and long-standing member of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), all pro-slaughter organizations.

Together, the combination of Pfizer and Lentz provokes confusion as to the sincerity in advocating for the “unwanted horse” dilemma that allegedly exists in NA according to some. How can a pro-horse slaughter disciple legitimately and propitiously advocate for the horse while at the same time the very company that employs this individual and supports the initiative is a major contributor to the problem?

In any case, Pfizer has always been at the centre of the slaughter debate through its continued sponsorship of pro-slaughter organizations. It has simply taken the meat industry lobbyist’s heated deliberations of re-opening the slaughter plants to “solve” the so-called “unwanted horse” impasse that has unlocked the flood gates to greater visibility.

Probably the most incriminating, yet irrefutably lucrative, of Pfizer’s strategies was its alliance with the undeniably pro-slaughter American Horse Council (AHC) in June of 2010. A powerful trade organization in Washington, DC representing the horse industry, the AHC lobbies before Congress and Federal Agencies to champion all aspects of the equine industry, including the “unwanted horse” dilemma and ultimately to promote their slaughter manifesto, albeit veiled in manipulative rhetoric.

What also came with this pact was The Unwanted Horse Coalition (UHC), a broad alliance of equine organizations that joined together under the AHC in 2006 and now operates under its auspices. The UHC mission statement is overwhelmingly misleading:

“The mission of the Unwanted Horse Coalition is to reduce the number of unwanted horses and to improve their welfare through education and the efforts of organizations committed to the health, safety, and responsible care and disposition of these horses.” [1]

Truth be told, the UHC was created in 2005 in response to the ever growing movement in the US that would see the horse slaughter plants close in 2007. Founders of the UHC cleverly coined the term “unwanted horse” as a devious contrivance to convince the public there are no viable alternatives to slaughter – control the terminology, control the outcome. In fact there are “excess” horses not “unwanted” horses as a direct result of over-breeding and the multi-million dollar commercial horse meat industry.

Pro-slaughter? Without a doubt.

What’s more, currently there are thirty-two (32) horse or horse-related organizations in the US that are members of the UHC and this number continues to grow. [2] Moreover, it is disturbing to think that some of these groups have elected to join in their dogma. In other words, if logic prevails, then all of these organizations are also pro-slaughter. Why else would such an affiliation exist?

Apart from Pfizer’s sponsorship of the AHC and other associations such as NAERIC (PMU industry) and the Equine Health and Welfare Council (EHWC) for example, there is also the UHC and its affiliates, at least 12 of which Pfizer currently sponsors for a number of different venues.

The question that begs asking is why the sponsorship of all of these pro-horse slaughter groups?

“Under the umbrella of the AHC and its affiliates Pfizer now benefits with the support of the most powerful equine organizations in North America. Although this will not remove the stigma of PMU farming and the cast-off foals of the industry, it nonetheless leverages their position in terms of horse slaughter and the “unwanted horse’ – a “humane” alternative by their standards.” [3]

a. Safety in numbers?
b. Acceptance in consequence of the status quo?
c. You scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours?
d. Morally responsible image?
e. Money?
f. All of the above.

Web of Evil Graphic

Whatever the reason(s), it is despicable in nature and betrays the fundamental bond between the horse and mankind. Truly a “Web of Evil.”

Recent news however has shed a new and interesting light on Pfizer’s strategy.

“Pfizer seeks to unload animal health division

The world’s largest drugmaker plans to shed its animal health division.

Officials with Pfizer announced yesterday that the company is seeking “strategic alternatives” for Pfizer Animal Health as well as its nutrition division, which manufactures infant formulas and other baby foods.

“Both Animal Health and Nutrition are strong businesses with attractive customer bases and solid fundamentals, but distinct enough from our core businesses that their value may be best maximized outside the company,” says Ian Read, Pfizer’s president and chief executive officer, in a press release. “In exploring these alternatives, we can determine what options will best drive their future growth opportunities and expansion, and enable shareholders to potentially realize higher value for these businesses.” [4]

The article goes on to say: “In 2010, Pfizer Animal Health brought in revenues of approximately $3.6 billion.” Not too shabby. This is over three and a half times the projected sales for Pfizer’s HRT therapies (Premarin®, Aprela®) of over one billion USD by 2015. Why don’t they unload this division instead? This alternative would auspiciously impact their reputation in regard to ending the insidious horror and suffering within the PMU industry from the perspective of both women and horses alike.

Nonetheless, the question then remains. Is this in some twisted way related to the horse industry? Will it have any impact on the plight of horses in North America and elsewhere in the world? It certainly seems like a lucrative division to relinquish. Only time will tell.
———-
[1] http://www.unwantedhorsecoalition.org/

[2] http://www.unwantedhorsecoalition.org/?id=4

[3] http://tuesdayshorse.wordpress.com/2011/06/29/calling-the-kettle-black-pfizer-the-horrible/

[4] http://news.vin.com/VINNews.aspx?articleId=19080

Focus on the welfare of the horse (how vet groups see it)

The causes of animal neglect and abuse vary, but two main ones generally are economic reasons and ignorance of what proper care of horses entails.

By NANCY BRANNON | Mid-South Horse Review News | Story URL

Gray Line

This year’s American Horse Council National Issues Forum focused on welfare of the horse. Dr. Scott Palmer, former President of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, in his keynote address, pointed out how human relations with horses have evolved over the ages. He stressed the importance of maintaining the balance between logos (logic), ethos (ethics) and pathos (emotion) in the care of horses. “There is no denying the emotional benefits from our relationship with horses, yet these rewards come with a responsibility to embrace the ethical and logical aspects of horse ownership,” he said.

Gary Carpenter of the American Quarter Horse Foundation spoke to the Forum about knowing the difference between opinion and fact. He emphasized the importance of staying informed on all equine welfare issues, not just those affecting your activities, and the importance of informing others about welfare efforts the horse industry is making.

The American Veterinary Medical Association defines animal welfare as “the ethical responsibility of ensuring animal well-being, …the condition in which animals experience good health, are able to effectively cope with their environment, and are able to express a diversity of species-typical behaviors. Protecting an animal’s welfare means providing for its physical and mental needs. Ensuring animal welfare is a human responsibility that includes consideration for all aspects of animal well-being, including proper housing, management, nutrition, disease prevention and treatment, responsible care, humane handling, and, when necessary, humane euthanasia.” More information about the AVMA position is at http://www.avma.org/issues/animal_welfare/default.asp.

Kate F. Hurley, DVM, MPVM in “Animal Cruelty and Neglect: Recognition, Reporting and Resources” (2005) wrote: animal abuse includes “a range of behaviors harmful to animals, both intentional and unintentional harm or neglect. Animal cruelty statutes exist in all 50 states, but legal definitions of cruelty vary. A listing of some state animal cruelty laws can be found at http://www.animal-law.org/statutes/index.html. In addition to unnecessary torture, suffering or death, definitions of cruelty may include failure to provide adequate food, water, or medical care, improper confinement or transportation, animal abandonment and animal fighting, and many other categories of prohibited behavior.”

The causes of animal neglect and abuse vary, but two main ones generally are economic reasons and ignorance of what proper care of horses entails. Another factor is animal hoarding, which is “defined as: (1) keeping more than the typical number of companion animals. (2) Inability to provide even minimal standards of nutrition, sanitation, shelter, and veterinary care, with this neglect often resulting in starvation, illness, and death. (3) Denial of the inability to provide this minimum care and the impact of that failure on the animals, the household, and human occupants of the dwelling” (Hurley 2005).

Reporting animal abuse is a requirement in many states. The American Veterinary Medical Association “(AVMA) recognizes that veterinarians may observe cases of animal abuse or neglect as defined by federal or state laws, or local ordinances. When these situations cannot be resolved through education, the AVMA considers it the responsibility of the veterinarian to report such cases to appropriate authorities. Disclosure may be necessary to protect the health and welfare of animals and people. Veterinarians should be aware that accurate record keeping and documentation of these cases are invaluable.” For more information, see: http://www.avma.org/issues/policy/animal_welfare/abuse.asp. Enforcement of animal cruelty laws is the purview of a variety of agencies, varying by locality. Animal cruelty laws are often enforced by “County or city animal control officers; Humane officers employed by non-profit animal shelters; and local police or county sheriff” (Hurley 2005).

Recently, two Memphis, Tennessee television stations aired news stories about starving and neglected horses. WMC-TV5 reported August 24 about an attempted rescue of alleged starving horses in DeSoto County, MS. On September 9, WREG News Channel 3 reported the rescue of starving horses in Lansing, Arkansas, where the owner could face felony charges. In April 2008, 11 neglected horses were confiscated from a Fayette County man, who was later found guilty of “animal cruelty charges for mistreating 17 horses he kept on his farm in Williston, TN” [report from the Commercial Appeal 7/19/08].

The WMC-TV5 report concerned alleged neglect of several horses owned by Ann Johnson at Wynnewood Stables on Center Hill Road in DeSoto County, Mississippi. The story recounted veterinarian Dr. Jennifer Dunlap seeing something that horrified her when she was at the stable working on a boarder’s horse. “The four horses that we saw had body condition scores of one out of nine – basically hide stretched over bone,” she said. Dunlap said the horses had little access to water or food, and feared they couldn’t last much longer. The owner of the horses was reported to say they have cancer. Veterinarian, Dr. Mark Akin reported that he had examined the horses in question and “did not see any signs of abuse. The horses are old and have dealt with some disease issues in the past.”

A boarder at the stable expressed great concern for the health and well being of these horses. She said these horses are not totally without food and water, but do not get nearly enough hay and grain for maintenance, and their water is often dirty and insufficient. She said she knows of seven other horses in the same condition at this stable who died last year.

Dr. Mark Akin is a past member of the American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) Welfare Committee. He spoke about animal neglect/abuse in general and the horses at Wynnewood in particular. “My definition of abuse is: deliberate, malicious infliction of pain on animals with intent to physically harm the animals.” Dr. Akin also remarked about neglect. “Ann Johnson is guilty of neither one,” he said. He gave detailed information about the physical condition of five horses “in question” at Wynnewood, their long-term medical conditions and why they do not put on weight and keep weight on. The conditions he described include: heart murmurs in two of the horses; weekly colic in one horse; another with a tumor on the jaw; one with “bad, bad GI ulcers in the stomach and small intestine;” one with “an arthritic right knee;” one with an eye tumor, a Squamous cell carcinoma; and another has “an abscess in the right front foot, and is grossly underweight.” He believes that the owner is not guilty of animal cruelty. “It’s not for lack of caring, but it’s hard for her to let go. This [condition] is not acceptable to me or to her, but she’s trying to deal with the horses’ multiple organ system problems.”

Dr. Jennifer Dunlap saw many of the same medical problems described by Dr. Akin. She was at the barn when the August rescue of the ailing horses was attempted. “I looked at the horses’ manure. There was nothing in the manure, no speck of grain. There should have been some bits of grain in the manure. It was dark, tarry, and there was bark, inappropriate feedstuff, in the manure. These horses exhibit the classic signs of starvation. Four of the horses are not likely to survive. One thin horse in the large group is questionable. The boarders’ horses are “OK” and sufficiently cared for. Dr. Dunlap said there had been another attempted rescue of the horses in February of this year.

Research of additional sources found the following information about Squamous cell carcinomas, heart murmurs, and effects of starvation.

“Squamous cell carcinoma has been reported to be the second most commonly diagnosed tumor of the horse, representing up to twenty percent of diagnosed neoplasms. About 80% of eye neoplasms are malignant. Squamous cell carcinoma occurs most frequently in horses 8-10 years old and may occur more frequently in those with lightly- or non-pigmented eyelids. [Sources: “Veterinary Corner 12/99: Common Skin Tumors of the Horse,” by Scott Habegger, DVM; The Merck Veterinary Manual]

“A recent study showed that only 10% of horses with heart murmurs have reduced performance. Weight loss is a common sequel to chronic disease in the horse. Some conditions which cause severe weight loss include: parasitism; neoplasia n especially gastrointestinal or pituitary; EIA; dental problems; debilitating injuries, e.g., joint infections; and heart problems. In the absence of chronic disease, aging and/or severe malnutrition are the primary causes of progressive weight loss. Jerry Finch’s “From Seizure to Adoption: A guide to rehabilitating the starved horse indicates that the “lingering effects of starvation” include “heart murmurs.” Finocchio finds that systolic murmurs are often detected, most likely due to anemia. [Source: “Equine Starvation: Recognition and rehabilitation of the recumbent, malnourished horse,” by E. J. Finocchio, DVM]

Jerry Finch’s article provided further information. “In its last days, a starved horse looks like skin has been sprayed over its skeleton, with well defined hip bones, spinal processes and ribs just underneath the skin. Despite so many odds, the will to live often keeps the horse going far longer than it seems possible. We’ve seen them eat fence posts and rails, trees and dirt, just to stay alive a little longer.

“There are any number of reasons why a horse might get into this condition, but the primary reason is either lack of knowledge or economic failure on the part of the person charged with caring for the horse.

“What eventually kills the horse isn’t what you see on the outside, it’s the effects within the horse’s system that brings a horrible, prolonged death. When access to feed and hay is denied, the body starts using carbohydrates and fat to produce the necessary energy. These are naturally stored in a healthy horse, but can be depleted fairly rapidly, and once gone, the system will turn to protein to keep it alive, drawing protein from muscles, the heart and all the other organs. The cause of weight loss always represents the basic fact that far too few calories are being consumed.

“Horses that have been abused or neglected may suffer from any number of issues in addition to the outwardly-apparent weight loss: dehydration; intestinal parasites; colic; diarrhea, skin problems and parasites that may cause hair loss (rain rot, mange, lice, ticks); joint problems; weakness; inability to rise; difficulty standing or walking; hoof problems (thrush, laminitis, cracked hooves); sores comparable to bed/pressure sores in humans; cut, abrasions, and open wounds; equine distemper (Strangles) and accompanying abscesses and nasal discharge; pneumonia; liver failure; heart murmurs …”

Dr. Kim Garner of Big Creek Animal Hospital said, “Horses starve for reasons not always related to food. Rehabilitation takes money, time, and effort and not everyone has these. Animals are a responsibility n not a right. If a person is not taking proper care of them, then they shouldn’t have the animals. It is less cruel to euthanize them than to watch them starve to death.

“Horses need individualized care and adequate stabling in a safe situation. Appropriate diets should be formulated, and fed at appropriate amounts and frequencies. Horses need TLC. The weather will get cold soon and horses that have virtually no body fat will die without intervention. Even with intervention they may die, but they at least stand a chance of survival.”

The law concerning abuse and neglect is clear. Mississippi Cruelty To Animals Statutes, Title 97, Chapter 41 states:

“97-41-1. Living creatures not to be cruelly treated. If any person shall override, overdrive, overload, torture, torment, unjustifiably injure, deprive of necessary sustenance, food, or drink; or cruelly beat or needlessly mutilate; or cause or procure to be overridden, overdriven, overloaded, tortured, unjustifiably injured, tormented, or deprived of necessary sustenance, food or drink; or to be cruelly beaten or needlessly mutilated or killed, any living creature, every such offender shall, for every offense, be guilty of a misdemeanor.

“97-41-2. Seizure of mistreated animal: (1) All courts in the State of Mississippi may order the seizure of an animal by a law enforcement agency, for its care and protection upon a finding of probable cause to believe said animal is being cruelly treated, neglected or abandoned. Such probable cause may be established upon sworn testimony of any person who has witnessed the condition of said animal. The court may appoint an animal control agency, agent of an animal shelter organization, veterinarian or other person as temporary custodian for the said animal, pending final disposition of the animal pursuant to this section. Such temporary custodian shall directly contract and be responsible for any care rendered to such animal, and may make arrangements for such care as may be necessary. Upon seizure of an animal, the law enforcement agency responsible for removal of the animal shall serve notice upon the owner of the animal, if possible, and shall also post prominently a notice to the owner or custodian to inform such person that the animal has been seized. Such process and notice shall contain a description of the animal seized, the date seized, the name of the law enforcement agency seizing the animal, the name of the temporary custodian, if known at the time, and shall be signed by the court issuing the order.”

DeSoto County Sheriff Bill Rasco said he had been out to Wynnewood Stables several times over the last three years. He said he, personally, has had horses his entire life. He agreed that the horses are in bad shape, but said, “The horses have feed and water there. If I thought the horses were being mistreated, I would step in. But there’s no way I can go out there and make her put her horses down. Those horses are old. She’s had them for a long time and has become attached to them. She said if she thought the horses were in pain she would be willing to put them down. But I don’t have the authority to step in when the horses have hay, feed, and water, and have veterinary care. I believe Ms. Ann cares about the horses and gives them what they need. However, I do have the authority to step in when I think horses are being mistreated.”

The need for proper care for horses, and the results of inadequate care, is an issue that is likely to remain prominent as the economy continues to take its toll. Information about adequate care can be obtained from courses offered by the UT Extension Office. Numerous rescue groups are available to accept surrendered horses and find suitable homes for them. It will be a great day when animals can get the proper care they need and abuse and neglect will be an extinct legacy.

Heneke Equine Body Condition Scoring

0 – Poor

1 – Very Thin

2 – Thin

3 – Moderately Thin

4 – Moderate

5 – Moderate to Fleshy

6 – Fleshy

Other charts use numbers 1 to 7.

For detailed descriptions of each body condition score, see: http://equineprotectionnetwork.com/cruelty/henneke.htm