Wild horse advocates to get Court hearing on West Douglas herd

Douglas Creek Mare
Douglas Creek Mare

A federal court rejected a request from the Bureau of Land Management to dismiss or limit a suit brought by wild horse advocates to save Colorado’s West Douglas wild horse herd.

Although the bureau withdrew its 2010 plans to cut the wild horse herd early in 2011, the consortium of wild horse advocacy groups and concerned citizens still want the courts to decide whether the bureau has the legal authority to zero out a herd.

By her ruling, Judge Rosemary Collyer agreed that advocates could proceed with their claim.

The battle over the West Douglas herd is nearly two decades old, and only through the efforts of concerned citizens and organisations have the horses been saved from the BLM’s desire to remove them all from their homelands.

In 2009, opponents won the first case in the United States against the bureau’s practices of eliminating wild horse herds when Judge Collyer set aside the department’s 2008 roundup plans.

In 2010 advocates again sued the bureau and it withdrew its plans to cut the herd.

“The court agreed that we have the right to challenge the decision to zero out the herd, originally made in the 2005 Amendment, despite the fact that the BLM has decided not to perform a round up and removal in 2010,” said Bruce Wagman of Schiff Hardin LLP, legal lead for the groups.

“BLM has been trying to avoid the issue with self-serving tactics, but the court found the BLM’s decision to hold off on this year’s gather ‘does not effect any change to the allegedly improper decision to eliminate the herd as soon as practicable’. This is, of course, exactly what we argued.”

Co-counsel Valerie Stanley said: “For years, BLM has issued cookie-cutter environmental assessments that purport to elicit public opinion on whether wild horses and burros should be removed from the public lands, all the time knowing that they set these eradication decisions in stone years previously. Read more at HorseTalk >>

3 thoughts on “Wild horse advocates to get Court hearing on West Douglas herd”

  1. Its funny how people want to cut there teeth in on wild horse issues. Whats important to see is the “new people” don’t research case history. They’re court orders against the BLM already in place on the actions they do. So spend your time making the Judges enofrce there orders. In order to keep up with the “flees on the elephant” one must know which one to follow. The BLM throws many signals to confuse the newbees. The argument they have is, well we got in court, and thats not an argument thats a purse string and you better have deep pockets because the federal government certainly does. Remember to rid the elephant of the flees you have to follow one and focus.

    Like

  2. I work in law – litigation, civil all the way to the Supreme Court. Are lawsuits to be filed for every Band or herd under orders for roundup? I just don’t get it. There are suits filed so photographs can be taken, so individual herds can be protected. Be careful where you pit your money folks. There is a hard choice to make.

    Like

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s