Greg Hall, who covers Thoroughbred racing for the Louisville Courier-Journal, reports:
“Trying to make a point that horse racing is cleaner than the Olympics, an association for state racing commissions wants Olympic drug testers to release the names of athletes who are allowed to use performance enhancing drugs.
“The head of the Association of Racing Commissioners International, which proposes rules for individual racing commissions, said Tuesday that horses are not given any exemptions, but the perceptions are that Olympic sports are clean and horse racing is tainted.
“When you look at the facts, the perception that (the Olympic) games will be drug free and horse racing is drug ridden is an Olympic-sized deception,” ARCI President Ed Martin said in a statement. “The challenge is real for both, but horse racing’s transparency and hard line against virtually all performance enhancing therapeutics may explain why some think racing’s problem is bigger than it is.”
“The call for disclosure in the London Summer Olympics that start Friday was made as the racing industry conducts a bitter debate over whether race day medication should be banned from thoroughbred racing on the day of a race.”
Olympic Games drug free? Doubtful. US horse racing drug ridden? Definitely. But so what?
Say every single Olympic athlete, equine or otherwise, tested positive for some sort of banned medicationn, how does that cancel out the fact that US horse racing is absolutely infested with drugs.
And then this.
Horse racing’s “transparency”, “hard line against virtually all performance enhancing therapeutics”, and “some think racing’s problem is bigger than it is” — implying it is not.
Am I going mad, or on the way back?
I challenge even one Olympic athlete to test positive for a drug 40 times more powerful than morphine made from the excretions of an exotic frog.
The rest of the article covers the tedious debate over the use of the anti-bleeder drug Salix (enough already) that every single racehorse in America absolutely must have on race day (or blood will spurt from their noses in front of the punters) that no other horse racing nation seems to find mandatory. In most if not all of these countries, in the rare instances a horse turns out to be a “bleeder” they simply are not allowed to race again, full stop.
Now the powers that be in American horse racing are arguing over whether or not all American Thoroughbreds now have the genetic proclivity to be a bleeder. That would certainly solve the anti-bleeder issue for the pro-Lasix folks if they could prove it, or perhaps hire a ghostwriter to prove it for them. But if they did that, then no one outside the US would buy their horses. . .
Pass the Bute.